22. October 2009 · Comments Off · Categories: Family · Tags: ,
Parents-Illustration
By RICHARD A. FRIEDMAN, M.D.
Published: October 19, 2009

You can divorce an abusive spouse. You can call it quits if your lover mistreats you. But what can you do if the source of your misery is your own parent?

Granted, no parent is perfect. And whining about parental failure, real or not, is practically an American pastime that keeps the therapeutic community dutifully employed.

But just as there are ordinary good-enough parents who mysteriously produce a difficult child, there are some decent people who have the misfortune of having a truly toxic parent.

A patient of mine, a lovely woman in her 60s whom I treated for depression, recently asked my advice about how to deal with her aging mother.

“She’s always been extremely abusive of me and my siblings,” she said, as I recall. “Once, on my birthday, she left me a message wishing that I get a disease. Can you believe it?”

Over the years, she had tried to have a relationship with her mother, but the encounters were always painful and upsetting; her mother remained harshly critical and demeaning.

Whether her mother was mentally ill, just plain mean or both was unclear, but there was no question that my patient had decided long ago that the only way to deal with her mother was to avoid her at all costs.

Now that her mother was approaching death, she was torn about yet another effort at reconciliation. “I feel I should try,” my patient told me, “but I know she’ll be awful to me.”

Should she visit and perhaps forgive her mother, or protect herself and live with a sense of guilt, however unjustified? Tough call, and clearly not mine to make.

But it did make me wonder about how therapists deal with adult patients who have toxic parents.

The topic gets little, if any, attention in standard textbooks or in the psychiatric literature, perhaps reflecting the common and mistaken notion that adults, unlike children and the elderly, are not vulnerable to such emotional abuse.

All too often, I think, therapists have a bias to salvage relationships, even those that might be harmful to a patient. Instead, it is crucial to be open-minded and to consider whether maintaining the relationship is really healthy and desirable.

Likewise, the assumption that parents are predisposed to love their children unconditionally and protect them from harm is not universally true. I remember one patient, a man in his mid-20s, who came to me for depression and rock-bottom self-esteem.

It didn’t take long to find out why. He had recently come out as gay to his devoutly religious parents, who responded by disowning him. It gets worse: at a subsequent family dinner, his father took him aside and told him it would have been better if he, rather than his younger brother, had died in a car accident several years earlier.

Though terribly hurt and angry, this young man still hoped he could get his parents to accept his sexuality and asked me to meet with the three of them.

The session did not go well. The parents insisted that his “lifestyle” was a grave sin, incompatible with their deeply held religious beliefs. When I tried to explain that the scientific consensus was that he had no more choice about his sexual orientation than the color of his eyes, they were unmoved. They simply could not accept him as he was.

I was stunned by their implacable hostility and convinced that they were a psychological menace to my patient. As such, I had to do something I have never contemplated before in treatment.

At the next session I suggested that for his psychological well-being he might consider, at least for now, forgoing a relationship with his parents.

I felt this was a drastic measure, akin to amputating a gangrenous limb to save a patient’s life. My patient could not escape all the negative feelings and thoughts about himself that he had internalized from his parents. But at least I could protect him from even more psychological harm.

Easier said than done. He accepted my suggestion with sad resignation, though he did make a few efforts to contact them over the next year. They never responded.

Of course, relationships are rarely all good or bad; even the most abusive parents can sometimes be loving, which is why severing a bond should be a tough, and rare, decision.

Dr. Judith Lewis Herman, a trauma expert who is a clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, said she tried to empower patients to take action to protect themselves without giving direct advice.

“Sometimes we consider a paradoxical intervention and say to a patient, ‘I really admire your loyalty to your parents — even at the expense of failing to protect yourself in any way from harm,’ ” Dr. Herman told me in an interview.

The hope is that patients come to see the psychological cost of a harmful relationship and act to change it.

Eventually, my patient made a full recovery from his depression and started dating, though his parents’ absence in his life was never far from his thoughts.

No wonder. Research on early attachment, both in humans and in nonhuman primates, shows that we are hard-wired for bonding — even to those who aren’t very nice to us.

We also know that although prolonged childhood trauma can be toxic to the brain, adults retain the ability later in life to rewire their brains by new experience, including therapy and psychotropic medication.

For example, prolonged stress can kill cells in the hippocampus, a brain area critical for memory. The good news is that adults are able to grow new neurons in this area in the course of normal development. Also, antidepressants encourage the development of new cells in the hippocampus.

It is no stretch, then, to say that having a toxic parent may be harmful to a child’s brain, let alone his feelings. But that damage need not be written in stone.

Of course, we cannot undo history with therapy. But we can help mend brains and minds by removing or reducing stress.

Sometimes, as drastic as it sounds, that means letting go of a toxic parent.

Dr. Richard A. Friedman is a professor of psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College.

15. October 2009 · Comments Off · Categories: Economy, Politics · Tags: , ,

Dow3-DJIA1

By Max Fisher on October 14, 2009 3:22pm

Understanding the Dow's 10,000 Peak Artemuestra/Flickr This has been a big day in finance, with bankers raking in $140 billion in compensation and the Dow cracking the five-digit mark. Today, the Dow Jones Industrial Average momentarily surpassed 10,000, a symbolic watershed that rekindles hope in the financial sector’s recovery and boosts optimism for further economic growth. The Dow–which peaked at 14,000 in late 2007, slipped below 10,000 a year ago, and bottomed out around 6,550 this March–is only one, singularly totemic financial indicator. But, as both a financial and symbolic measurement, it still carries weight.

  • Not Yet Out of The Woods CNN Money’s Chris Isidore explains why we have a long way to go. “Lately, there has been a growing consensus among both investors and economists that the battered U.S. economy hit bottom and turned around earlier this year, and is now in a recovery,” he writes. “But even economists who agree the economy is in recovery say that growth will be slow and difficult, with continued job losses, tight credit and further declines in home prices. And even some who believe that the current Dow 10,000 level is justified say there’s still a significant risk that the economy will take a step backward.”
  • Industry Not Optimistic NPR’s Kevin Whitelaw suggests businesses are far from confident, which means employment may not yet catch up. “It is bound to boost confidence in the short run, but it won’t extinguish the lingering doubts about how strong that recovery is going to be,” he writes. “There’s also the question of how the Fed and other institutions will unwind the massive efforts they have undertaken to prop up the nation’s economy, including keeping interest rates hovering near record lows. [...] More broadly, there is a sense that the economy is in uncharted waters, which makes businesses, consumers and economists alike leery of taking risks.”
  • Same Greed That Drove The Crash Forbes’s Stanley Bing thinks it’s bad news. “It shows that no matter what’s really going on underneath our economic system, investors want to make money and think they can still do so by buying and selling stocks and sometimes even bonds. Yay for those cockeyed optimists! They make the world go ’round!” he scoffs. “All hope for ridiculous future wealth for each of us resides with the rampant, uncontrolled, irrational exercise of organized greed that drives the markets. It looks like we’re well on the way to total recovery in more ways than one, ladies and gentlemen.”
  • What About Jobs and Sales? Joe Gandelman sees the Dow climb as little more than a symbol overshadowed by more concrete economic indicators. “The good news is that the Dow has approached 10,000. The bad news is that retail sales are still lousy,” writes Gandelman, the editor of the Moderate Voice. “In general it looks like it will be a s-l-o-w recovery…particularly with jobs loss persisting as a national problem (and notable problem for Democrats heading into 2010).”
  • Not a Political Marker Steve Benen cautions that the Dow is not a gauge of Obama’s success. “Of course, using the markets as some kind of financial approval rating for the administration is foolish,” he writes in his Washington Monthly blog. “The value of Wall Street indexes is hardly the best metric for measuring the strength of the economy. Dow 10,000 is just a symbolic milestone.”
  • Compare to March ’09 Low Discover Magazine’s Chris Mooney is optimistic. “Wow, it was only a year ago when the whole financial system seemed on the brink of collapse; today, by contrast, if only briefly (so far), the Dow topped 10,000, a huge rebound from its March 09 low of 6,547. Do folks think the nightmare is finally coming to an end?”
  • Compare to 1999 High Peter Boockvar of the Big Picture asks us to “reminisce about 1999, the year it first passed that magic level.” He recalls, “Karl Malone, Pudge, Chipper Jones, Jagr and Kurt Warner won MVP awards and the average price of a gallon of gasoline at the pump was about $1.20. US nominal GDP ended at $9.6b vs $14.1 as of Q2 ’09. Also, on March 29th 1999, the DXY was at 100.36 (now 75.60), the CRB was at 192.40 (now 269.15), gold was at $280 (now $1,060), oil was $16.44 (now $74.80), corn was $2.32 (now $3.85), copper was $.62 (now $2.83), the 10 yr yield was 5.19% (now 3.38%), and the fed funds rate was at 4.75% (now 0-.25%). Oh, how time flies.”

politicalcorrection

LANSINGBURGH — High school senior Matthew Whalen is the kind of student any parent would want.

He’s an Eagle Scout, on the honor roll, taking Advanced Placement classes, and never been in trouble with the law.  He’s received commendations from the City of Troy and the Boy Scouts of America for saving a woman’s life, and this past summer, he completed Army basic training.  All of it was accomplished before the age of 17.

“I’m just trying to do what I can while I can,” Matthew says.

His goal is to attend the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, a dream since he was in grade school.

“I have a first-grade yearbook that says I want to be driving tanks in the Army,” Matthew says.  “I mean, this is something that I know I’ve always wanted to do.”

But the dream could be in jeopardy, thanks to a two-inch pocket knife that officials at Lansingburgh Senior High School found in Matthew’s locked car last month.  The pocket knife was a gift from his grandfather, Robert Whalen, who’s the Hoosick Falls Police Chief.  Matthew says he kept the knife in a side compartment and never tried showing it off or threatening anyone with it.  Instead it was a part of the survival kit that was his car.

“My car is designed in a way that if I ever broke down, I’d be OK,” Whalen explains.  “I have a sleeping bag.  I have bottled water.  I have an MRE.  I believe it’s better to be prepared and not need it than need it and not have it.”

Matthew says school officials approached him on Sept. 21, asking if he had a weapon on him.  When Matthew answered he did not, he says the officials asked if he had a knife in his car.  Matthew said it was a pocket knife, and took officials to his car when asked.  He also turned over the pocket knife when asked.

The Lansingburgh Central School District has a zero-tolerance policy on weapons.  According to the district’s Codes of Conduct, students are not allowed to have “a weapon of any kind” on school grounds.  Even though a pocket knife is not considered a weapon under New York State penal code, the district also prohibits students from possessing anything “that reasonably can be considered a weapon.”

According to Matthew, the school suspended him for five days, during which time a Superintendent’s hearing was held to determine the extent of his punishment.  Matthew’s family contends only the high school’s principal and athletic director were present, not the Superintendent or the assistant principal who initially suspended Matthew.  And despite a letter from Matthew’s Scout Master explaining how a pocket knife is a common tool for scouts to have, the district suspended Matthew for another 15 days.  The Whalens say they received no explanation as to why, and they claim there was no opportunity to ask.

“I want him to have fair treatment based on his character,” says Matthew’s father, Bryan Whalen.  “It just totally baffles me that they would go after this when they have much bigger fish to fry.”

The Whalens say during the Superintendent’s hearing, officials admitted that Matthew cooperated fully, didn’t have the pocket knife on him, had no intention of using it, and never threatened anyone with it.  “They’d already made their decision,” Whalen’s father says.

In a statement to NEWS10, Superintendent George J. Goodwin says, “We do not comment on discipline related to an individual student.  Our policies are clear that weapons are not permitted on school premises and subject to disciplinary consequences.”

Legal expert Thomas Carr, of Tully Rinckey PLLC, says school districts are within their rights to impose and enforce safety policies, even if a pocket knife is not considered a weapon under New York State penal law.  But he also says such school rules can quickly become so-called “gray areas” that leave the meaning of what’s considered a weapon open ended.

“If this 17-year-old is driving his car to school,” Carr says, “let’s face it, the tire iron in the trunk to change the wheel is much more of a deadly weapon than a one-and-a-half inch blade knife.”

Carr also says the Whalens might have grounds to pursue legal action against the district if Matthew felt he had no choice but to allow school officials to search his car.

At this point, the Whalens are not sure when or if they will sue the district.  Instead, they want the district to reinstate Matthew immediately and remove this from his official student record.

“He needs to be doing the application for his admission to West Point right now,” Bryan Whalen says.  “They’re delaying that, and that could be very costly for him.”

Matthew says he wants to follow in the military footsteps of his father and grandfather.  His grandfather, Robert Whalen, received two Purple Hearts for his service in the Vietnam War.  Bryan Whalen served in Operation Iraqi Freedom and at Ground Zero, as his unit was on the scene by the evening of Sept. 11, 2001.  He’s also received the Soldier’s Medal from the U.S. Army, and he pulled survivors from a burning helicopter that had crashed at the Stratton Air National Guard Base during an air show crash in 1991.

Matthew guesses a student must have told school officials, but he doesn’t know who did it or why.  His father thinks it might have been a prank to see Matthew get a little heat from administrators and that the intent was for it to never get this far.

“It’s just plain wrong of what they’ve done,” he says.  “It isn’t a weapon!”

But the family feels the district overreacted, if not for suspending Matthew in the first place, then for adding an additional 15 days to the original suspension.

“If they had told me, ‘Take this out of your car,’ I would have said alright, and it never would have been an issue,” Matthew says.  “I was upset with it, but I can understand that.  They have the zero-tolerance rule.”

The district provides a tutor for Matthew for 90 minutes every day; he’s banned from stepping on school grounds for any reason whatsoever, including assignments and sporting events.  Matthew says it’s hard to cram more than six hours of work into his tutor time, and he says his work is not being graded until he returns to school.  All he wants is to return to class.

“The rest of my life could be affected by this,” he says.

08. October 2009 · Comments Off · Categories: Tech · Tags: , , ,

By Louis Bedigian

We really want the player to feel differently when they’re playing as the Rookie as opposed to playing as one of the four other ODST’s. Every time you find yourself back in the streets of New Mombasa at night we want you to feel lonely, lost, and perhaps a bit damp.”

marty_o_donnell

Few games were as hotly anticipated this year as Halo 3: ODST. This pseudo-spin-off holdover game (a holdover till the next true Halo chapter, of course) was once thought to be an online expansion. It quickly turned into a full-fledged project that required all the elements that a high-end Halo game demands, including a killer soundtrack.

But unlike the first three Halo games, players would not be hearing familiar sounds this time around. “Halo 3 finished the fight for Master Chief and all his friends,” said Halo series composer Martin O’Donnell. “ODST is an entirely new story in the Halo universe. It gave me the opportunity to write all new music that sets a completely different mood.”

Once you had solidified a style for the music, how much did it change – or perhaps evolve – as the writing process began?

Martin O’Donnell: Joe Staten, the writer and one of the lead designers, came to me and said that ODST was going to be a detective story set in a film-noir style version of New Mombasa. From the beginning of pre-production I was looking for a compositional approach to match that vision.

What are some of the feelings and emotions you hope this score conveys?

Martin O’Donnell: We really want the player to feel differently when they’re playing as the Rookie as opposed to playing as one of the four other ODST’s. Every time you find yourself back in the streets of New Mombasa at night we want you to feel lonely, lost, and perhaps a bit damp. We also want you to feel like you need to find your squad mates as soon as possible, so maybe some urgency too.

Each of the previous Halo games features memorable songs that players will never forget. Is there any particular song in Halo 3: ODST that you hope will achieve similar acclaim?

Martin O’Donnell: I don’t think I have one in particular, but I sure hope one of the pieces will be memorable for the audience. It might be a different one for different people.

Have you done anything new with the interactive element(s) of the music?

Martin O’Donnell: I used some accompaniment tracks in sync with some improvised sax solo’s that play differently every time you play the game that I thought worked pretty well. We also used more randomization for the many pieces that might play in the hub (night time New Mombasa).

And what do you think about the current state of interactivity in video game music? How much further can we go?

Martin O’Donnell: It’s not easy to make elegant music adapt to player’s choices but game composers have made a lot of progress in this area. I think there is still a lot of interesting things that we can do with music in games.

Most gamers know you as the composer of the Halo series, but you are also Bungie’s audio director. Tell us about this side of the job and how it differs from composing.

Martin O’Donnell: I’ve done most of my composing with Mike Salvatori, but in ODST I also collaborated with C Paul Johnson and Stan LePard on new music. Jay Weinland is Bungie’s Audio Lead. He and C Paul do the lion’s share of sound design for the game. I’m privileged to be able to oversee and direct the work they do. Since I want to have a singular audio vision for each game I’m responsible for every single sound that comes out of the speakers. That means I need to work with the writers, designers, artists, producers, actors, programmers, and even the testers to help ensure that our game is as polished as possible.

As the man in charge of Halo 3: ODST’s overall sound, not just the music, what other changes (if any) did you want for this spin-off?

Martin O’Donnell: We want every new game we make to raise the bar in some way. We tried to advance the way we tell story and create atmosphere. There are some subtle things we had to do to make the nighttime city streets sound wetter than the same streets in daytime. We also had a lot of fun creating the radio plays that tell Sadie’s story.

The characters of Halo 3: ODST are voiced by some prominent actors. Talk about this.

Martin O’Donnell: We had hired three of the cast from Firefly for Halo 3. They did such a great job for us and were so much fun to work with that we decided to not only get them back for ODST but adjust the writing to fit them even better. We got Nathan Fillion as Buck, Alan Tudyk as Mickey, and Adam Baldwin as Dutch right away. We also love working with veteran game actor Nolan North and thought he would be perfect as Romeo. We still needed our “femme fatale” and after a little searching we asked Tricia Helfer from Battlestar Galactica to be Captain Dare. It was a blast working with these great actors and for the first time we had two actors in the booth at the same time. Nathan and Tricia worked together and the chemistry was real.

I’ve heard that you don’t like to plan out your scores too much in advance and that you prefer to write the music after a game is completed. Is that true? And if so, what makes this strategy work for you?

Martin O’Donnell: I don’t know many movie composers who compose music before the film is in post-production. Usually composers need a scene to be close to finish in order for it to be scored. I feel the same way about a game score. There are other ways of composing for games, but this works best for me. I don’t actually wait until the game is finished, but I prefer waiting until the levels are at least somewhat playable. This means that during much of the game’s development there isn’t much music.

Have any developers, umm, complained about this strategy? From what I can tell, most developers prefer that a composer starts working on the score before the game is complete.

Martin O’Donnell: Regardless of how popular this particular strategy is, I think the result speaks for itself. I work on music almost from the moment we begin pre-production on a game but I don’t finish the majority of the music until close to the end of post-production. And yes, some developers have complained a bit about this method.

In addition to your work on the Halo series, you also own a music production studio, TotalAudio. Tell us about this and some of the other work you’ve done or plan to do in the future.

Martin O’Donnell: I’m a full-time Bungie employee and partner. I’m also President of TotalAudio. My composing and business partner, Mike Salvatori, keeps TotalAudio running. The only official new work that TotalAudio has done for the past eight years has been work for Bungie. Who knows about the future?

Speaking of the future, you’ve worked on four Halo games, and I think we all can assume you’ll be working on Halo: Reach. Is your music exclusive to Bungie? Are there any other games – maybe a new franchise – that you’d like to work on?

Martin O’Donnell: Halo: Reach is certainly enough for me to be working on for the near future. It’s no mystery that Bungie has big plans for the project after that. Right now I’m pretty excited about those plans.

energy

How a Smart Grid Will Spur Energy Entrepreneurship

Posted by: John Tozzi on October 06

BW’s Rachael King explains the details behind a buzzword we hear a lot now, the smart grid. In essence, the smart grid would do for power what the Internet did for information: replace a one-way distribution system with a two-way, interactive network.

Government bodies and utility providers are in the early stages of this multibillion-dollar upgrade to transform the existing grid into a two-way network where power and information flow in both directions between the utility and the customer, not just from the provider to the user.

The tech sector’s interest is fitting considering the similarities between the energy-grid upgrade and the computing revolution of the 1980s that saw hulking, centralized mainframes give way to PCs. The existing U.S. power grid dispenses electricity but is limited in its ability to gather intelligence from end users—hence the monthly visit from a meter reader. Now utilities are replacing outmoded meters with so-called smart meters that foster a back-and-forth between customer and utility. In much the same way PCs opened the door to third-party software and services and use of the Internet, smart meters are paving the way for tools and services that make the system more responsive to shifts in energy demands.

Energy entrepreneurs are developing new technologies for generating, storing, and conserving power. Cleantech investing is beginning to recover from the hit it took last year. But changing the underlying energy infrastructure from a one-way power grid to a smart two-way grid could open the gates for more energy entrepreneurs, at different scales.

If the grid is something more like an open network, small producers can sell energy back to utilities. So maybe local farmers have an incentive to generate their own power with solar panels or wind turbines. As King notes, smart meters create opportunities for new technology as well: Software that helps households and businesses reduce their usage at peak times, for example.

The broader point here is that this is the kind of shift entrepreneurs should be attuned to. Any major systemic change — in this case to a piece of infrastructure that everyone uses constantly — opens up opportunity. Not everyone recognized the shift in the early days of the Internet (and a lot of those who didn’t — think industries like news and music — paid dearly). Don’t miss the story and special report on the smart grid.

06. October 2009 · Comments Off · Categories: Economy, Money · Tags: , , , ,

Bank_of_America

Source

Last Friday’s job report showed that most of the US is experiencing enormous economic pain, even if America’s economy is now in a recovery. Overall unemployment rose to 9.8%, with the unemployment rate for men hitting a new post-depression high. The economy shed another 260,000 jobs in September and the previous figure for jobs lost in the recession was revised up by more than 800,000. The average workweek continues to shorten. With real wages falling, this ensures that most workers will be taking home shrinking wages.

For the vast majority of people in the country, who derive the vast majority of their income from working, the economy looks really awful. But the economy is not looking bad for everyone.

As we are constantly reminded, the financial crisis is behind us and the banks are back in their feet. In fact, they are more than just back on their feet. In many ways they are doing better than ever. The most recent data from the commerce department shows that the financial industry profits now account for more than 31.5% of all corporate profits. This is a higher share than at any point during the housing bubble years.

Of course, it is not that hard to make profits when you get to borrow money from the Fed at almost no interest and then lend it back to the government at 3.5% interest. Suppose the state of California was given the privilege of not only borrowing $1 trillion from the Fed at near zero interest but also using the money to buy Treasury bonds paying 3.5% interest. The $35bn in annual interest rate subsidies would take care of California’s huge budget deficit pretty quickly.

But hey, California is just a big state. It’s not a Wall Street bank. Congress is not going to tolerate special treatment for state governments.

The “save the banks” crew continues to peddle a seriously misleading story, mostly without challenge. They tell us that we had no choice. If we didn’t give the banks trillions of dollars in their hour of desperate need, then the situation would be even worse.

There is no doubt that a complete collapse of the financial system would have complicated the recovery. However, handing the banks trillions, no questions asked, was not the only alternative.

Last year we faced a situation in which nearly every major bank faced bankruptcy: they could not pay their debts without the help of the government. Rather than just make below market loans, with few or no conditions, we could have made loans conditional on changing the way the banks did business. This would mean prohibiting them from dealing in complex derivative instruments, limiting leverage and seriously cutting executive compensation. (How does a $2m absolute cap – counting bonuses, stock options and other perks – sound?)

We could have done this because the US government held all the cards. If they didn’t get money from us they would have been out of business. We could have told them to run around Wall Street naked, to walk on hot coals, to wear stupid looking hats, the choice was shutting down their banks and looking for new jobs.

Instead, we just handed them the cash, no questions asked. Now the banks are bigger and badder than ever and paying out big bonuses, just like before. As things stand, they will be an even bigger drain on the economy in the years ahead than they were in the years leading up to crash.

And, if anyone thinks that the banks have learned something about safe business practices, they have not been paying attention. What the banks have learned is that if you wreck your bank, and incidentally bring down the economy in the process, you can just send your lobbyists to Congress and the White House with empty bags and ask to have them filled up with money. The lesson is that Congress will say yes.

The politicians and the media can be counted on running to protect the banks in their hour of need. While tens of millions of people losing their jobs or their homes is just an unfortunate aspect of the modern economy, the collapse of Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, or Bank of America is a tragedy that our elites just can’t fathom.

So, be prepared to endure many more years of high unemployment, under-employment and declining real wages. Upwards of two million people are likely to lose their homes in 2010 and 2011. But the good news is that the economy is recovering and the banks are alright.